Table 2 |
|
|
Sampling by Respondent Category (N = 1197 respondents) |
|
| REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES CLIENTS |
|
|
|
|
| Female RH Clients (FGD and IDI) |
176 |
| Male RH Clients (FGD and IDI) |
35 |
| Women with Cervical Cancer (IDI) |
9 |
|
|
|
| COMMUNITY MEMBERS |
|
|
|
|
| Women (FGD) |
319 |
| Men (FGD) |
58 |
| Community leaders/Influentials (IDI and FGD) |
74 |
|
|
|
| POLICY INFLUENTIALS |
|
|
|
|
| Policymakers, health authorities, health program directors (IDI) |
71 |
|
|
|
| PROVIDERS (Interviews and Focus Group Discussions) |
|
|
|
|
| Obstetricians/Gynecologists (IDI) |
45 |
| Other Physicians, Female Medical Officers, Medical Students, Interns (IDI and FGD) |
136 |
| Radiotherapists, technicians (IDI) |
10 |
| Nurses, Nursing Students, Paramedical Staff (IDI and FGD) |
129 |
| Chemists, Registered Medical Practitioners, Traditional Healers (IDI and FGD) |
48 |
| Researchers, Statisticians, Demographers (IDI) |
14 |
| Cytopathologists and Laboratory Personnel (IDI) |
73 |
|
|
|
|
IDI – In-depth interviews FGD – Focus group discussions |
|
|
Dabash et al. Reproductive Health 2005 2:11 doi:10.1186/1742-4755-2-11 |
|
