Table 4 |
|||||
|
The association of background characteristics of married women with current family planning use in Butajira district, 2009 (N = 5746) |
|||||
|
Background characteristics |
# of married women using FPM |
# of married women not using FPM |
Crude OR (95%CI) |
Adjusted OR (95%CI) |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Ecology |
Highland |
356 |
1800 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Lowland |
415 |
1710 |
1.23 (1.05, 1.43)* |
1.14 (0.96, 1.35) |
|
|
Urban |
685 |
777 |
4.46 (3.82, 5.20)* |
2.30 (1.66, 3.18)* |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Educational status |
Never |
800 |
108 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Primary |
481 |
829 |
2.43 (2.12, 2.78)* |
1.32 (1.12, 1.56)* |
|
|
Secondary plus |
175 |
3350 |
6.79 (5.27, 8.73)* |
1.99 (1.38, 2.88)* |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Food shortage |
Yes |
387 |
1563 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
No |
1069 |
2724 |
1.58 (1.39, 1.81)* |
0.89 (0.76, 1.04) |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Dead child |
Yes |
429 |
1899 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
No |
966 |
2117 |
2.02 (1.77, 2.30)* |
1.30 (1.13, 1.50)* |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Partner's education |
Never |
336 |
1881 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Primary |
825 |
2126 |
2.17 (1.89, 2.50)* |
1.32 (1.13, 1.55)* |
|
|
Secondary plus |
295 |
280 |
5.90 (4.83, 7.21)* |
1.50 (1.12, 2.01)* |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Migration |
Non-migrant |
823 |
2756 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
In-migrant |
633 |
1531 |
1.38 (1.23, 1.56)* |
1.01 (0.87, 1.16) |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Livelihood |
Farming |
794 |
3499 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
Trade/service |
339 |
466 |
3.21 (2.73, 3.76)* |
1.13 (0.82, 1.56) |
|
|
Civil servant |
159 |
113 |
6.20 (4.81, 7.99)* |
1.25 (0.79, 1.98) |
|
|
Other |
164 |
209 |
3.46 (2.78, 4.30)* |
1.15 (0.80, 1.67) |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Discussion |
Yes |
1283 |
2537 |
5.23 (4.40, 6.22)* |
2.21 (1.80, 2.70)* |
|
No |
167 |
1728 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Husband support |
yes |
1288 |
2610 |
4.92 (4.14, 5.85)* |
2.59 (2.11, 3.17)* |
|
No |
168 |
1676 |
1.0 |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
*9 5% confidence interval |
|||||
|
Mekonnen and Worku Reproductive Health 2011 8:37 doi:10.1186/1742-4755-8-37 |
|||||
