<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Reproductive Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Reproductive Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/9/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/1/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/8/1/37" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/3/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/2/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/7/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/9/1/6" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/14">
        <title>Religiosity and teen birth rate in the United States</title>
        <description>Background:
The children of teen mothers have been reported to have higher rates of several unfavorable mental health outcomes. Past research suggests several possible mechanisms for an association between religiosity and teen birth rate in communities.
Methods:
The present study compiled publicly accessible data on birth rates, conservative religious beliefs, income, and abortion rates in the U.S., aggregated at the state level. Data on teen birth rates and abortion originated from the Center for Disease Control; on income, from the U.S. Bureau of the Census, and on religious beliefs, from the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey carried out by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. We computed correlations and partial correlations.
Results:
Increased religiosity in residents of states in the U.S. strongly predicted a higher teen birth rate, with r = 0.73 (p &lt; 0.0005). Religiosity correlated negatively with median household income, with r = -0.66, and income correlated negatively with teen birth rate, with r = -0.63. But the correlation between religiosity and teen birth rate remained highly significant when income was controlled for via partial correlation: the partial correlation between religiosity and teen birth rate, controlling for income, was 0.53 (p &lt; 0.0005). Abortion rate correlated negatively with religiosity, with r = -0.45, p = 0.002. However, the partial correlation between teen birth rate and religiosity remained high and significant when controlling for abortion rate (partial correlation = 0.68, p &lt; 0.0005) and when controlling for both abortion rate and income (partial correlation = 0.54, p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
With data aggregated at the state level, conservative religious beliefs strongly predict U.S. teen birth rates, in a relationship that does not appear to be the result of confounding by income or abortion rates. One possible explanation for this relationship is that teens in more religious communities may be less likely to use contraception.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Strayhorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jillian Strayhorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, null:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-14</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>Birth rate predicted by religious beliefs </dc:title>
                            <dc:description>Higher birth rates in US teens are strongly predicted for by conservative religious beliefs, irrespective of income, and could be a result of reluctance to use birth control in these communities. </dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-6-14-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/3">
        <title>Limits to modern contraceptive use among young women in developing countries: a systematic review of qualitative research</title>
        <description>Background:
Improving the reproductive health of young women in developing countries requires access to safe and effective methods of fertility control, but most rely on traditional rather than modern contraceptives such as condoms or oral/injectable hormonal methods. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative research to examine the limits to modern contraceptive use identified by young women in developing countries. Focusing on qualitative research allows the assessment of complex processes often missed in quantitative analyses.
Methods:
Literature searches of 23 databases, including Medline, Embase and POPLINE&#174;, were conducted. Literature from 1970&#8211;2006 concerning the 11&#8211;24 years age group was included. Studies were critically appraised and meta-ethnography was used to synthesise the data.
Results:
Of the 12 studies which met the inclusion criteria, seven met the quality criteria and are included in the synthesis (six from sub-Saharan Africa; one from South-East Asia). Sample sizes ranged from 16 to 149 young women (age range 13&#8211;19 years). Four of the studies were urban based, one was rural, one semi-rural, and one mixed (predominantly rural). Use of hormonal methods was limited by lack of knowledge, obstacles to access and concern over side effects, especially fear of infertility. Although often more accessible, and sometimes more attractive than hormonal methods, condom use was limited by association with disease and promiscuity, together with greater male control. As a result young women often relied on traditional methods or abortion. Although the review was limited to five countries and conditions are not homogenous for all young women in all developing countries, the overarching themes were common across different settings and contexts, supporting the potential transferability of interventions to improve reproductive health.
Conclusion:
Increasing modern contraceptive method use requires community-wide, multifaceted interventions and the combined provision of information, life skills, support and access to youth-friendly services. Interventions should aim to counter negative perceptions of modern contraceptive methods and the dual role of condoms for contraception and STI prevention should be exploited, despite the challenges involved.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Williamson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alison Parkes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Wight</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Petticrew</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Graham Hart</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-02-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-6-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-02-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/9/1/7">
        <title>Implementation of legal abortion in Nepal: a model for rapid scale-up of high-quality care</title>
        <description>Unsafe abortion&apos;s significant contribution to maternal mortality and morbidity was a critical factor leading to liberalization of Nepal&apos;s restrictive abortion law in 2002. Careful, comprehensive planning among a range of multisectoral stakeholders, led by Nepal&apos;s Ministry of Health and Population, enabled the country subsequently to introduce and scale-up safe abortion services in a remarkably short timeframe. This paper examines factors that contributed to rapid, successful implementation of legal abortion in this mountainous republic, including deliberate attention to the key areas of policy, health system capacity, equipment and supplies, and information dissemination. Important elements of this successful model of scaling up safe legal abortion include: the pre-existence of postabortion care services, through which health-care providers were already familiar with the main clinical technique for safe abortion government leadership in coordinating complementary contributions from a wide range of public- and private-sector actors reliance on public-health evidence in formulating policies governing abortion provision, which led to the embrace of medical abortion and authorization of midlevel providers as key strategies for decentralizing care and integration of abortion care into existing Safe Motherhood and the broader health system. While challenges remain in ensuring that all Nepali women can readily exercise their legal right to early pregnancy termination, the national safe abortion program has already yielded strong positive results. Nepal&apos;s experience making high-quality abortion care widely accessible in a short period of time offers important lessons for other countries seeking to reduce maternal mortality and morbidity from unsafe abortion and to achieve Millennium Development Goals.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/9/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Ghazaleh Samandari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Merrill Wolf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Indira Basnett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alyson Hyman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kathryn Andersen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-9-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-9-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/1/1/3">
        <title>WHO systematic review of maternal morbidity and mortality: the prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (near miss)</title>
        <description>AimTo determine the prevalence of severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM) worldwide (near miss).MethodSystematic review of all available data. The methodology followed a pre-defined protocol, an extensive search strategy of 10 electronic databases as well as other sources. Articles were evaluated according to specified inclusion criteria. Data were extracted using data extraction instrument which collects additional information on the quality of reporting including definitions and identification of cases. Data were entered into a specially constructed database and tabulated using SAS statistical management and analysis software.
Results:
A total of 30 studies are included in the systematic review. Designs are mainly cross-sectional and 24 were conducted in hospital settings, mostly teaching hospitals. Fourteen studies report on a defined SAMM condition while the remainder use a response to an event such as admission to intensive care unit as a proxy for SAMM. Criteria for identification of cases vary widely across studies. Prevalences vary between 0.80% &#8211; 8.23% in studies that use disease-specific criteria while the range is 0.38% &#8211; 1.09% in the group that use organ-system based criteria and included unselected group of women. Rates are within the range of 0.01% and 2.99% in studies using management-based criteria. It is not possible to pool data together to provide summary estimates or comparisons between different settings due to variations in case-identification criteria. Nevertheless, there seems to be an inverse trend in prevalence with development status of a country.
Conclusion:
There is a clear need to set uniform criteria to classify patients as SAMM. This standardisation could be made for similar settings separately. An organ-system dysfunction/failure approach is the most epidemiologically sound as it is least open to bias, and thus could permit developing summary estimates.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/1/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Lale Say</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Pattinson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>A Metin Gulmezoglu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2004, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-08-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-1-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-1-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-08-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/8/1/37">
        <title>Determinants of low family planning use and high unmet need in Butajira District, South Central Ethiopia</title>
        <description>Background:
The rapid population growth does not match with available resource in Ethiopia. Though household level family planning delivery has been put in place, the impact of such programs in densely populated rural areas was not studied. The study aims at measuring contraception and unmet need and identifying its determinants among married women.
Methods:
A total of 5746 married women are interviewed from October to December 2009 in the Butajira Demographic Surveillance Area. Contraceptive prevalence rate and unmet need with their 95% confidence interval is measured among married women in the Butajira district. The association of background characteristics and family planning use is ascertained using crude and adjusted Odds ratio in logistic regression model.
Results:
Current contraceptive prevalence rate among married women is 25.4% (95% CI: 24.2, 26.5). Unmet need of contraception is 52.4% of which 74.8% was attributed to spacing and the rest for limiting. Reasons for the high unmet need include commodities&apos; insecurity, religion, and complaints related to providers, methods, diet and work load. Contraception is 2.3 (95% CI: 1.7, 3.2) times higher in urbanites compared to rural highlanders. Married women who attained primary and secondary plus level of education have about 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.6) and 2 (95% CI: 1.4, 2.9) times more risk to contraception; those with no child death are 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.5) times more likely to use contraceptives compared to counterparts. Besides, the odds of contraception is 1.3 (95% CI: 1.1, 1.6) and 1.5 (1.1, 2.0) times more likely among women whose partners completed primary and secondary plus level of education. Women discussing about contraception with partners were 2.2 (95% CI: 1.8, 2.7) times more likely to use family planning. Nevertheless, contraception was about 2.6 (95% CI: 2.1, 3.2) more likely among married women whose partners supported the use of family planning.
Conclusions:
The local government should focus on increasing educational level. It must also ensure family planning methods security, increase competence of providers, and create awareness on various methods and their side effects to empower women to make an appropriate choice. Emphasis should be given to rural communities.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/8/1/37</link>
                <dc:creator>Wubegzier Mekonnen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alemayehu Worku</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2011, null:37</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-12-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-8-37</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-8-37-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-12-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/3/1/2">
        <title>Use of antenatal services and delivery care among women in rural western Kenya: a community based survey</title>
        <description>Background:
Improving maternal health is one of the UN Millennium Development Goals. We assessed provision and use of antenatal services and delivery care among women in rural Kenya to determine whether women were receiving appropriate care.
Methods:
Population-based cross-sectional survey among women who had recently delivered.
Results:
Of 635 participants, 90% visited the antenatal clinic (ANC) at least once during their last pregnancy (median number of visits 4). Most women (64%) first visited the ANC in the third trimester; a perceived lack of quality in the ANC was associated with a late first ANC visit (Odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0&#8211;2.4). Women who did not visit an ANC were more likely to have &lt; 8 years of education (adjusted OR [AOR] 3.0, 95% CI 1.5&#8211;6.0), and a low socio-economic status (SES) (AOR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5&#8211;5.3). The ANC provision of abdominal palpation, tetanus vaccination and weight measurement were high (&gt;90%), but provision of other services was low, e.g. malaria prevention (21%), iron (53%) and folate (44%) supplementation, syphilis testing (19.4%) and health talks (14.4%). Eighty percent of women delivered outside a health facility; among these, traditional birth attendants assisted 42%, laypersons assisted 36%, while 22% received no assistance. Factors significantly associated with giving birth outside a health facility included: age &#8805; 30 years, parity &#8805; 5, low SES, &lt; 8 years of education, and &gt; 1 hour walking distance from the health facility. Women who delivered unassisted were more likely to be of parity &#8805; 5 (AOR 5.7, 95% CI 2.8&#8211;11.6).
Conclusion:
In this rural area, usage of the ANC was high, but this opportunity to deliver important health services was not fully utilized. Use of professional delivery services was low, and almost 1 out of 5 women delivered unassisted. There is an urgent need to improve this dangerous situation.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/3/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Anna van Eijk</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hanneke Bles</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Frank Odhiambo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Ayisi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ilse Blokland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Rosen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kubaje Adazu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laurence Slutsker</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kim Lindblade</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2006, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-04-06T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-3-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-3-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-04-06T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17">
        <title>Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs</title>
        <description>Consanguineous marriages have been practiced since the early existence of modern humans. Until now consanguinity is widely practiced in several global communities with variable rates depending on religion, culture, and geography. Arab populations have a long tradition of consanguinity due to socio-cultural factors. Many Arab countries display some of the highest rates of consanguineous marriages in the world, and specifically first cousin marriages which may reach 25-30% of all marriages. In some countries like Qatar, Yemen, and UAE, consanguinity rates are increasing in the current generation. Research among Arabs and worldwide has indicated that consanguinity could have an effect on some reproductive health parameters such as postnatal mortality and rates of congenital malformations. The association of consanguinity with other reproductive health parameters, such as fertility and fetal wastage, is controversial. The main impact of consanguinity, however, is an increase in the rate of homozygotes for autosomal recessive genetic disorders. Worldwide, known dominant disorders are more numerous than known recessive disorders. However, data on genetic disorders in Arab populations as extracted from the Catalogue of Transmission Genetics in Arabs (CTGA) database indicate a relative abundance of recessive disorders in the region that is clearly associated with the practice of consanguinity.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Ghazi Tadmouri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pratibha Nair</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tasneem Obeid</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mahmoud Al  Ali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Najib Al Khaja</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hanan Hamamy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-6-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/2/1/3">
        <title>Maternal mortality in the rural Gambia, a qualitative study on access to emergency obstetric care</title>
        <description>Background:
Maternal mortality is the vital indicator with the greatest disparity between developed and developing countries. The challenging nature of measuring maternal mortality has made it necessary to perform an action-oriented means of gathering information on where, how and why deaths are occurring; what kinds of action are needed and have been taken. A maternal death review is an in-depth investigation of the causes and circumstances surrounding maternal deaths. The objectives of the present study were to describe the socio-cultural and health service factors associated with maternal deaths in rural Gambia.
Methods:
We reviewed the cases of 42 maternal deaths of women who actually tried to reach or have reached health care services. A verbal autopsy technique was applied for 32 of the cases. Key people who had witnessed any stage during the process leading to death were interviewed. Health care staff who participated in the provision of care to the deceased was also interviewed. All interviews were tape recorded and analyzed by using a grounded theory approach. The standard WHO definition of maternal deaths was used.
Results:
The length of time in delay within each phase of the model was estimated from the moment the woman, her family or health care providers realized that there was a complication until the decision to seeking or implementing care was made. The following items evolved as important: underestimation of the severity of the complication, bad experience with the health care system, delay in reaching an appropriate medical facility, lack of transportation, prolonged transportation, seeking care at more than one medical facility and delay in receiving prompt and appropriate care after reaching the hospital.
Conclusion:
Women do seek access to care for obstetric emergencies, but because of a variety of problems encountered, appropriate care is often delayed. Disorganized health care with lack of prompt response to emergencies is a major factor contributing to a continued high mortality rate.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/2/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Mamady Cham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Johanne Sundby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Siri Vangen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2005, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-05-04T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-2-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-2-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-05-04T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/7/1/15">
        <title>Women&apos;s autonomy in household decision-making: a demographic study in Nepal</title>
        <description>Background:
How socio-demographic factors influence women&apos;s autonomy in decision making on health care including purchasing goods and visiting family and relatives are very poorly studied in Nepal. This study aims to explore the links between women&apos;s household position and their autonomy in decision making.
Methods:
We used Nepal Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) 2006, which provided data on ever married women aged 15-49 years (n = 8257). The data consists of women&apos;s four types of household decision making; own health care, making major household purchases, making purchase for daily household needs and visits to her family or relatives. A number of socio-demographic variables were used in multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship of these variables to all four types of decision making.
Results:
Women&apos;s autonomy in decision making is positively associated with their age, employment and number of living children. Women from rural area and Terai region have less autonomy in decision making in all four types of outcome measure. There is a mixed variation in women&apos;s autonomy in the development region across all outcome measures. Western women are more likely to make decision in own health care (1.2-1.6), while they are less likely to purchase daily household needs (0.6-0.9). Women&apos;s increased education is positively associated with autonomy in own health care decision making (p &lt; 0.01), however their more schooling (SLC and above) shows non-significance with other outcome measures. Interestingly, rich women are less likely to have autonomy to make decision in own healthcare.
Conclusions:
Women from rural area and Terai region needs specific empowerment programme to enable them to be more autonomous in the household decision making. Women&apos;s autonomy by education, wealth quintile and development region needs a further social science investigation to observe the variations within each stratum. A more comprehensive strategy can enable women to access community resources, to challenge traditional norms and to access economic resources. This will lead the women to be more autonomous in decision making in the due course.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/7/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Dev Acharya</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacqueline Bell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Padam Simkhada</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edwin Teijlingen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pramod Regmi</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2010, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-07-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-7-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-7-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-07-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/9/1/6">
        <title>Swedish high school students&apos; knowledge and attitudes regarding fertility and family building</title>
        <description>Background:
Infertility is a serious problem for those who suffer. Some of the risks for infertility are preventable and the individual should therefore have knowledge of them. The purposes of this study were to investigate high-school students&apos; knowledge about fertility, plans for family building and to compare views and knowledge between female and male students.
Methods:
A questionnaire containing 34 items was answered by 274 students. Answers from male and female students were compared using student&apos;s t-test for normally distributed variables and Mann-Whitney U-test for non-normal distributions. The chi-square test was used to compare proportions of male and female students who answered questions on nominal and ordinal scales. Differences were considered as statistically significant at a p-value of 0.05.
Results:
Analyses showed that 234 (85%) intended to have children. Female students felt parenthood to be significantly more important than male students: p = &lt; 0.01. The mean age at which the respondents thought they would like to start to build their family was 26 (&#177; 2.9) years. Men believed that women&apos;s fertility declined significantly later than women did: p = &lt; 0.01. Women answered that 30.7% couples were involuntarily infertile and men answered 22.5%: p = &lt; 0.01. Females thought it significantly more likely that they would consider IVF or adoption than men, p = 0.01. Men felt they were more likely to abstain from having children than women: p = &lt; 0.01. Women believed that body weight influenced fertility significantly more often than men: p = &lt; 0.01 and men believed significantly more often that smoking influenced fertility: p = 0.03. Both female and male students answered that they would like to have more knowledge about the area of fertility.
Conclusions:
Young people plan to start their families when the woman&apos;s fertility is already in decline. Improving young people&apos;s knowledge about these issues would give them more opportunity to take responsibility for their sexual health and to take an active role in shaping political change to improve conditions for earlier parenthood.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/9/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Maria Ekelin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cecilia Akesson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Malin Angerud</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Linda Kvist</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-9-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1742-4755-9-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

