<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Reproductive Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Reproductive Health</description>
        <dc:date>2009-12-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/14" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/13" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/12" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/21">
        <title>Pre-treatment preferences and characteristics among patients seeking in vitro fertilisation</title>
        <description>Background:
This study sought to describe patient features before beginning fertility treatment, and to ascertain their perceptions relative to risk of twin pregnancy outcomes associated with such therapy.
Methods:
Data on readiness for twin pregnancy outcome from in vitro fertilisation (IVF) was gathered from men and women before initiating fertility treatment by anonymous questionnaire.
Results:
A total of 206 women and 204 men were sampled. Mean (&#177; SD) age for women and men being 35.5 &#177; 5 and 37.3 &#177; 7 yrs, respectively. At least one IVF cycle had been attempted by 27.2% of patients and 33.9% of this subgroup had initiated &#8805;3 cycles, reflecting an increase in previous failed cycles over five years. Good agreement was noted between husbands and wives with respect to readiness for twins from IVF (77% agreement; Cohen&apos;s K = 0.61; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.70).
Conclusion:
Most patients contemplating IVF already have ideas about particular outcomes even before treatment begins, and suggests that husbands &amp; wives are in general agreement on their readiness for twin pregnancy from IVF. However, fertility patients now may represent a more refractory population and therefore carry a more guarded prognosis. Patient preferences identified before IVF remain important, but further studies comparing pre- and post-treatment perceptions are needed.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Walsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gary Collins</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monique Le Du</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Walsh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Scott Sills</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-21</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/20">
        <title>A multi-centre randomised controlled study of pre-IVF outpatient hysteroscopy in women with recurrent IVF implantation failure: Trial of Outpatient Hysteroscopy - [TROPHY] in IVF</title>
        <description>Background:
The success rate of IVF treatment is low. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis found that the outcome of IVF treatment could be improved in patients who have experienced recurrent implantation failure if an outpatient hysteroscopy (OH) is performed before starting the new treatment cycle. However, the trials were of variable quality, leading to a call for a large and high-quality randomised trial. This protocol describes a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that performing an OH prior to starting an IVF cycle improves the live birth rate of the subsequent IVF cycle in women who have experienced two to four failed IVF cycles.Methods and designEligible and consenting women will be randomised to either OH or no OH using an internet based trial management programme that ensures allocation concealment and employs minimisation for important stratification variables including age, body mass index, basal follicle stimulating hormone level and number of previous failed IVF cycles. The primary outcome is live birth rate per IVF cycle started. Other outcomes include implantation, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage rates.The sample size for this study has been estimated as 758 participants with 379 participants in each arm. Interim analysis will be conducted by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC), and final analysis will be by intention to treat. A favourable ethical opinion has been obtained (REC reference: 09/H0804/32).Trail RegistrationThe trial has been assigned the following ISRCTN number: ISRCTN35859078</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Tarek El-Toukhy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rudi Campo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sesh Sunkara</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yakoub Khalaf</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arri Coomarasamy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-20</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/19">
        <title>Inconsistent fertility motivations and contraceptive use behaviors among women in Honduras</title>
        <description>Background:
Recent studies have demonstrated that it is common for women to report inconsistent fertility motivations and family planning behaviors. This study examines these inconsistencies among urban Honduran women interviewed at two points in time and presents reasons for inconsistent fertility motivations and contraceptive behaviors at follow-up.
Methods:
Data come from a one-year panel study conducted in Honduras from October 2006 to December 2007. A total of 633 women aged 15-44 years were interviewed at baseline and follow-up and have non-missing information on the key variables of interest. At baseline and follow-up, women were asked how much of a problem it would be (no problem/small problem/big problem) if they got pregnant in the next couple of weeks. At follow-up, women were asked an open-ended question on reasons it would be no problem, a small problem, or a big problem. The open-ended question was recoded into a smaller set of response categories. Univariate and bivariate analyses are presented to examine inconsistencies and reasons for stated inconsistencies.
Results:
At follow-up, over half the women using a contraceptive method said that it would be no problem if they got pregnant. Nearly half of the women changed their perceptions between baseline and follow-up. Common reasons for reporting no problem among contraceptive users were that they accepted a child as God&apos;s will or that children are a blessing, their last child was old enough and they wanted another child. Common reasons for reporting a big/small problem among non-users of family planning (who have an unmet need for family planning) were that they were not in a stable relationship, the husband was not present, and they would expect a negative response from their family.
Conclusion:
Inconsistent fertility motivations and contraceptive behaviors are common among effective contraceptive users. Women who are using contraception and become pregnant will not necessarily report the pregnancy as unintended, given the widespread acceptance of unintended pregnancies in Honduras. Family planning providers need to recognize that fertility motivations vary over time and that women may not have firm motivations to avoid a pregnancy.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Ilene Speizer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laili Irani</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Janine Barden-O'Fallon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jessica Levy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-11-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-19</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-11-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/18">
        <title>WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections</title>
        <description>Background:
Caesarean section rates continue to increase worldwide with uncertain medical consequences. Auditing and analysing caesarean section rates and other perinatal outcomes in a reliable and continuous manner is critical for understanding reasons caesarean section changes over time.
Methods:
We analyzed data on 97,095 women delivering in 120 facilities in 8 countries, collected as part of the 2004-2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health in Latin America. The objective of this analysis was to test if the &quot;10-group&quot; or &quot;Robson&quot; classification could help identify which groups of women are contributing most to the high caesarean section rates in Latin America, and if it could provide information useful for health care providers in monitoring and planning effective actions to reduce these rates.
Results:
The overall rate of caesarean section was 35.4%. Women with single cephalic pregnancy at term without previous caesarean section who entered into labour spontaneously (groups 1 and 3) represented 60% of the total obstetric population. Although women with a term singleton cephalic pregnancy with a previous caesarean section (group 5) represented only 11.4% of the obstetric population, this group was the largest contributor to the overall caesarean section rate (26.7% of all the caesarean sections). The second and third largest contributors to the overall caesarean section rate were nulliparous women with single cephalic pregnancy at term either in spontaneous labour (group 1) or induced or delivered by caesarean section before labour (group 2), which were responsible for 18.3% and 15.3% of all caesarean deliveries, respectively.
Conclusion:
The 10-group classification could be easily applied to a multicountry dataset without problems of inconsistencies or misclassification. Specific groups of women were clearly identified as the main contributors to the overall caesarean section rate. This classification could help health care providers to plan practical and effective actions targeting specific groups of women to improve maternal and perinatal care.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Ana Betran</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Metin Gulmezoglu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Robson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mario Merialdi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joao Souza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Wojdyla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mariana Widmer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guillermo Carroli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Torloni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ana Langer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alberto Narvaez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alejandro Velasco</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anibal Faundes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Arnaldo Acosta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eliette Valladares</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mariana Romero</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nelly Zavaleta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sofia Reynoso</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vicente Bataglia</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17">
        <title>Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs</title>
        <description>Consanguineous marriages have been practiced since the early existence of modern humans. Until now consanguinity is widely practiced in several global communities with variable rates depending on religion, culture, and geography. Arab populations have a long tradition of consanguinity due to socio-cultural factors. Many Arab countries display some of the highest rates of consanguineous marriages in the world, and specifically first cousin marriages which may reach 25-30% of all marriages. In some countries like Qatar, Yemen, and UAE, consanguinity rates are increasing in the current generation. Research among Arabs and worldwide has indicated that consanguinity could have an effect on some reproductive health parameters such as postnatal mortality and rates of congenital malformations. The association of consanguinity with other reproductive health parameters, such as fertility and fetal wastage, is controversial. The main impact of consanguinity, however, is an increase in the rate of homozygotes for autosomal recessive genetic disorders. Worldwide, known dominant disorders are more numerous than known recessive disorders. However, data on genetic disorders in Arab populations as extracted from the Catalogue of Transmission Genetics in Arabs (CTGA) database indicate a relative abundance of recessive disorders in the region that is clearly associated with the practice of consanguinity.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Ghazi Tadmouri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pratibha Nair</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tasneem Obeid</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mahmoud Al  Ali</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Najib Al Khaja</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hanan Hamamy</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/16">
        <title>Audit of short term outcomes of surgical and medical second trimester termination of pregnancy</title>
        <description>Background:
As comparisons of modern medical and surgical second trimester termination of pregnancy (TOP) are limited, and the optimum method of termination is still debated, an audit of second trimester TOP was undertaken, with the objective of comparing the outcomes of modern medical and surgical methods.
Methods:
All cases of medical and surgical TOP between the gestations of 13 and 20 weeks from 1st January 2007 to 30th June 2008, among women residing in the local health board district, a tertiary teaching hospital in an urban setting, were identified by a search of ICD-10 procedure codes (surgical terminations) and from a ward database (medical terminations). Retrospective review of case notes was undertaken. A total of 184 cases, 51 medical and 133 surgical TOP, were identified. Frequency data were compared using Chi-squared or Fischer&apos;s Exact tests as appropriate and continuous data are presented as mean and standard deviation if normally distributed or median and interquartile range if non-parametric.
Results:
Eighty-one percent of surgical terminations occurred between 13 to 16 weeks gestation, while 74% of medical terminations were performed between 17 to 20 weeks gestation. The earlier surgical TOP occurred in younger women and were more often indicated for maternal mental health. Sixteen percent of medical TOP required surgical delivery of the placenta. Evacuation of retained products was required more often after medical TOP (10%) than after surgical TOP (1%). Other serious complications were rare.
Conclusion:
Both medical and surgical TOP are safe and effective for second trimester termination. Medical TOP tend to be performed at later gestations and are associated with a greater likelihood of manual removal of the placenta and delayed return to theatre for retained products. This case series does not address long term complications.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Annamarie Mauelshagen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lynn Sadler</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Helen Roberts</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mahesh Harillal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cynthia Farquhar</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/15">
        <title>Brazilian network for the surveillance of maternal potentially life threatening morbidity and maternal near-miss and a multidimensional evaluation of their long term consequences</title>
        <description>Background:
It has been suggested that the study of women who survive life-threatening complications related to pregnancy (maternal near-miss cases) may represent a practical alternative to surveillance of maternal morbidity/mortality since the number of cases is higher and the woman herself is able to provide information on the difficulties she faced and the long-term repercussions of the event. These repercussions, which may include sexual dysfunction, postpartum depression and posttraumatic stress disorder, may persist for prolonged periods of time, affecting women&apos;s quality of life and resulting in adverse effects to them and their babies.ObjectiveThe aims of the present study are to create a nationwide network of scientific cooperation to carry out surveillance and estimate the frequency of maternal near-miss cases, to perform a multicenter investigation into the quality of care for women with severe complications of pregnancy, and to carry out a multidimensional evaluation of these women up to six months.Methods/DesignThis project has two components: a multicenter, cross-sectional study to be implemented in 27 referral obstetric units in different geographical regions of Brazil, and a concurrent cohort study of multidimensional analysis. Over 12 months, investigators will perform prospective surveillance to identify all maternal complications. The population of the cross-sectional component will consist of all women surviving potentially life-threatening conditions (severe maternal complications) or life-threatening conditions (the maternal near miss criteria) and maternal deaths according to the new WHO definition and criteria. Data analysis will be performed in case subgroups according to the moment of occurrence and determining cause. Frequencies of near-miss and other severe maternal morbidity and the association between organ dysfunction and maternal death will be estimated. A proportion of cases identified in the cross-sectional study will comprise the cohort of women for the multidimensional analysis. Various aspects of the lives of women surviving severe maternal complications will be evaluated 3 and 6 months after the event and compared to a group of women who suffered no severe complications in pregnancy. Previously validated questionnaires will be used in the interviews to assess reproductive function, posttraumatic stress, functional capacity, quality of life, sexual function, postpartum depression and infant development.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Jose Cecatti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joao Souza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mary Parpinelli</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Samira Haddad</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rodrigo Camargo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rodolfo Pacagnella</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carla Silveira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dulce Zanardi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Costa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joao Pinto e Silva</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Renato Passini Jr</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fernanda Surita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Souza</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Iracema Calderon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lale Say</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Pattinson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Brazilian Network for Surveillance of Severe Maternal Morbidity</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-24T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-24T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/14">
        <title>Religiosity and teen birth rate in the United States</title>
        <description>Background:
The children of teen mothers have been reported to have higher rates of several unfavorable mental health outcomes. Past research suggests several possible mechanisms for an association between religiosity and teen birth rate in communities.
Methods:
The present study compiled publicly accessible data on birth rates, conservative religious beliefs, income, and abortion rates in the U.S., aggregated at the state level. Data on teen birth rates and abortion originated from the Center for Disease Control; on income, from the U.S. Bureau of the Census, and on religious beliefs, from the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey carried out by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. We computed correlations and partial correlations.
Results:
Increased religiosity in residents of states in the U.S. strongly predicted a higher teen birth rate, with r = 0.73 (p &lt; 0.0005). Religiosity correlated negatively with median household income, with r = -0.66, and income correlated negatively with teen birth rate, with r = -0.63. But the correlation between religiosity and teen birth rate remained highly significant when income was controlled for via partial correlation: the partial correlation between religiosity and teen birth rate, controlling for income, was 0.53 (p &lt; 0.0005). Abortion rate correlated negatively with religiosity, with r = -0.45, p = 0.002. However, the partial correlation between teen birth rate and religiosity remained high and significant when controlling for abortion rate (partial correlation = 0.68, p &lt; 0.0005) and when controlling for both abortion rate and income (partial correlation = 0.54, p = 0.001).
Conclusion:
With data aggregated at the state level, conservative religious beliefs strongly predict U.S. teen birth rates, in a relationship that does not appear to be the result of confounding by income or abortion rates. One possible explanation for this relationship is that teens in more religious communities may be less likely to use contraception.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/14</link>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Strayhorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jillian Strayhorn</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:14</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-09-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-14</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>14</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-09-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/13">
        <title>Social differentiation and embodied dispositions: a qualitative study of maternal care-seeking behaviour for near-miss morbidity in Bolivia</title>
        <description>Background:
Use of maternal health care in low-income countries has been associated with several socioeconomic and demographic factors, although contextual analyses of the latter have been few. A previous study showed that 75% of women with severe obstetric morbidity (near-miss) identified at hospitals in La Paz, Bolivia were in critical conditions upon arrival, underscoring the significance of pre-hospital barriers also in this setting with free and accessible maternal health care. The present study explores how health care-seeking behaviour for near-miss morbidity is conditioned in La Paz, Bolivia.
Methods:
Thematic interviews with 30 women with a near-miss event upon arrival at hospital. Near-miss was defined based on clinical and management criteria. Modified analytic induction was applied in the analysis that was further influenced by theoretical views that care-seeking behaviour is formed by predisposing characteristics, enabling factors, and perceived need, as well as by socially shaped habitual behaviours.
Results:
The self-perception of being fundamentally separated from &quot;others&quot;, meaning those who utilise health care, was typical for women who customarily delivered at home and who delayed seeking medical assistance for obstetric emergencies. Other explanations given by these women were distrust of authority, mistreatment by staff, such as not being kept informed about their condition or the course of their treatment, all of which reinforced their dissociation from the health-care system.
Conclusion:
The findings illustrate health care-seeking behaviour as a practise that is substantially conditioned by social differentiation. Social marginalization and the role health institutions play in shaping care-seeking behaviour have been de-emphasised by focusing solely on endogenous cultural factors in Bolivia.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/13</link>
                <dc:creator>Mattias Roost</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cecilia Jonsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jerker Liljestrand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Birgitta Essen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:13</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-13</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>13</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/12">
        <title>Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women</title>
        <description>Background:
A review of validated methods for assessing female sexual dysfunction and a review of male and female sexual dysfunction did not refer to any specific questionnaire for evaluating sexuality during pregnancy. A study was performed at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Botucatu Medical School, S&#227;o Paulo State University, Brazil to design and validate a pregnancy sexuality questionnaire, the Pregnancy Sexual Response Inventory (PSRI).
Methods:
Women with a singleton pregnancy between 10 and 35 weeks of gestation were randomly recruited. There were five phases in the development of the PSRI: (1) item selection; (2) item development; (3) determination of internal consistency, reliability and convergence; (4) content validity; and (5) determination of inter-interviewer reliability. Internal consistency and reliability were evaluated using Cronbach&apos;s alpha. Inter-interviewer reliability was assessed by evaluating the responses of 18 academics at various institutions, using Kappa Index and Student t test.
Results:
Good internal consistency and reliability were obtained (Cronbach&apos;s alpha coefficient = 0.79). Among the 18 academics, 13 totally agreed (K = 1.0), three partially agreed (K = 0.67) and two disagreed (K = 0.33) with the proposed questions. Comparisons of the mean PSRI domain scores made between the primary investigators and the other interviewers showed no significant differences in all domains (p &gt; 0.05).
Conclusion:
PSRI is a new validated instrument for evaluating sexuality and sexual activity and related health concerns during pregnancy.</description>
        <link>http://www.reproductive-health-journal.com/content/6/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Cibele Rudge</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Iracema Calderon</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Adriano Dias</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gerson Lopes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angelica Barbosa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Izildinha Maesta</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jon Odland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marilza Rudge</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Reproductive Health 2009, 6:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-07-29T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1742-4755-6-12</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Reproductive Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1742-4755</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-07-29T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
